Netflix is a wonderful thing. As well as providing hours of distraction and enabling a deadly snack food habit that's going to have me looking like Jabba the Hut in 20 years, it’s got a good line in
documentaries and lectures, and recently added a chunk of the TED back catalogue. For those people who are unaware
of TED, it’s a global set of conferences run by a non-profit organisation which
are in some way inspirational, extraordinary or significant either because of
the speaker or the topic.
One of the talks I've watched recently is Simon Sinek’s “How
great leaders inspire action”. Sinek is
very charismatic and watchable, but once you boil it down, his key premise is simple. He believes that you
have to have a core proposition, whether as a person, business or brand that
you understand and believe in, and all messaging that works flows from
that core belief. Without that understanding, your messaging will fail. He encapsulates this
in the idea of the ‘Golden Circle’.
The Golden Circle |
- Why: Why are you here? What makes you get out of bed in the morning? What drives you? Or, what is the core of your brand/product/company?
- How: How are you going to do what you do? What enables you to be that person or deliver that service?
- What: What is it that you are? What do you provide? What product/service do you offer?
His supposition is that most people go about this backwards, talking
about the easiest first, which is the 'what'. Most people know what the do in an operational sense. "We provide [X] product", They sometimes get the how, but generally miss a lot or all of the ‘why’. This fails because he believes we make decisions with our limbic brains which controls our
decision making but not language and rational thought which sits in the neocortex.
The idea is not completely new. It’s in the core theory of branding when you
need both a vision and a mission statement for your brand to understand what
you are and why you are there. It’s also
in marketing 101 looking at ‘Features, Attributes and Benefits’ or F/A/Bs, where
you look at each tangible feature of a product/service or company, and list out
what that can mean and what the more intangible benefits are for the recipient,
whether it’s saving time, money, increasing prestige, aiding self-validation etc. For example, if talking about a new medical device to a procurement department: "Our new device has a simple menu system that is 20% faster to set up,/ which will allow your staff to see more patients in a day / so reduce waiting lists and save you money in staff time" And in certain companies, they do encourage
your external messaging to be B/A/Fs where possible, rather than F/A/Bs. i.e. “Save money by reducing your waiting lists/by using staff time more efficiently and enabling them to have more appointments per day/ made possible because our devices have a
simple menu system that is 20% faster to set up”.
But it’s the simplicity of his model that
works. If you can articulate the golden
circle in one or two sentences for your core products/brands, you’re probably a
lot further along the curve than many of your competitors. Even well known and loved brands probably
lack a chunk of ‘why’ inside the businesses they serve. Then you need to check the consistency of
that message; you might be able to layout the proposition but can your
colleagues in Customer Services?
Operations? Because if they can’t,
something’s not been carried forwards. And that's not even looking at your customers and how they perceive what they receive (hint: it's often not what you think).
The talk also struck a chord when thinking much more in
the context of leadership: until watching that talk,
I’d never really considered the repercussions of leaders/managers personal F/A/Bs on the
team around them. You can do a really good job managing a team and it's performance even if you don't believe in the company; but you're managing rather than leading or inspiring and that is different. And you'll have lesser outputs from your team. It’s having some core beliefs that shape your actions and that will cause other people to follow, in internal and external roles, such
as: “I believe we can be main influencers in the global company/through
excellence in strategy, planning, implementation and innovation/ whilst
providing marketing and commercial services”.
It’s a simple but effective method of ensuring that teams remain focused and dedicated even if changes are going around them, be it changes in structure, personnel or direction. If you have an influencer in your company, then they have to believe in what they and their team are doing, or everyone loses focus. I feel that this is part of a manager's role and responsibility: to define the core 'why' of their team or department and be that role model.
It's not about being falsely positive, it's about being genuine and finding something within what you are doing that you believe in. It doesn't even have to reflect the currently reality because aspirational visions can pull a team towards that goal. Believe that your team are at the core of commercial strategy, and your requests to them, the questions you ask, the projects you all work on will be in line with that goal, and cause your team to become those strategic leaders, even if they weren't before.
At worst, it’s worth bearing in mind that if you understand the importance of belief, and recognise your lack of belief, you can change it. The slightly clichéd affirmations in front of a mirror have a basis in clinical trials: Festinger and Carlsmith (1959) studies on forced compliance demonstrated that if you act in a way contrary to your beliefs, you will change your beliefs to match, and numerous other studies have replicated that. Act like you believe in what you are doing long enough, and you’ll start to believe it yourself, although I would question why you're working in for a company you really don't believe in!
So the core is, know why you’re doing what you’re doing
(with conviction!), understand how you are going to do it, and then do it, and
people will follow.
Guess I'll be off to do a bit of Why/What/How then!
Guess I'll be off to do a bit of Why/What/How then!
No comments:
Post a Comment